street
talk
Home » How We Think » Street Talk » Entries
Why Report On Annuals?
5Last week, my firm issued its 2010 Report on Annuals. Among other things, the piece is intended to help companies get more out of this “annual” project - from themes to avoid (e.g., “Well-Positioned for Future Growth”) to the potential of online and more.
I might be old school, but I don’t understand why so many yearn to kill the annual report as a communication tool. Yes, investors can access financial data more quickly through other channels… but they can’t access management’s view of the near-term competitive landscape, long-range growth opportunities and performance against plan more quickly than through a well-crafted annual report. Yes, it’s less expensive to simply update website content… but what’s the opportunity cost of limiting the growth potential of management’s credibility that can be nurtured through a consistently clear and candid annual report content. Remember: when you update a web page, the old content disappears - unless you’re Angela Bennett - while annual reports can be compared and contrasted year-over-year by investors to gauge strategic focus and progress… huh… maybe that’s why folks are trying to kill the annual report!
If you are a non-believer of annual reports, I’d love to hear your rationale.
The Conversation
Thomas Rosenmayr on October 11, 2010
Mike Mitchell on October 11, 2010
I also agree with Rob and Thomas. For many companies the preparation of the annual report is an opportunity to review and revise strategy and pull together all the activities of the company. Well run companies tend to spend time on producing a good annual report.
Chuck Hemann on October 11, 2010
RGB -
You knew I’d have an opinion on this. I actually agree with you about the value of an annual report. They do provide a source of “guidance” for investors for the coming FY. It’s a great way for the “issuer” to share its strategy to grow the company for the rest of the year and beyond.
Nobody disputes the value… what we dispute is having to go through another crappy report. The design of these books are typically old and tired. The messaging is straight out of 1990-something. Very little originality. If someone wanted to “wow” me (not that I’m the bellweather for anything) they’d focus on creating a killer interactive report that outlines all of the stuff you (and the commenters) have pointed out. It’s now time for companies to get over the “fear” of doing things online. Investors want it. They want info when it is convenient for them…not the company. So how about we start a crusade to get more companies to embrace the goodness of a rock solid interactive annual report and relegate the “book” to stoke the fire over the coming winter months? What say you?
Mike Mitchell on October 11, 2010
We’ve seen some big improvrmrnts in the quality of communication through the AR in Europe - particulary since we adopted new rules on narrative reporting. Its a pity in some ways that all this good stuff does sometimes get relegated to gather dust on the shelf. Some companies use the information and case studies to populate the investor sections of the web site so that those who don’t want to venture in to the AR can also get the benefit.
Rob Berick on October 11, 2010
Chuck - you raise a good point re: online. I would think XBRL will fuel some of this migration. That said, I think there’s still a place for the print version (a lot rides on the make-up of the shareholder base)... frankly, the format doesn’t matter if the content isn’t distinctive and insightful.
Leave a Comment
About rob
Position:Senior Managing Director
Rob oversees Dix & Eaton’s investor relations practice and is a member of the firm’s Leadership Committee. Over his nearly 20-year career, he has developed and executed investor relations programs for companies in a wide range of industries and market cap sizes.
Latest Tweets
@theofrancis No doubt about it re: "resounding defeat" Wont be too far off that we're surprised when one passes I suspect.
May 21, 2012 12:46
Should we be surprised by such votes still? MT @theofrancis: Another #SOP defeat: Simon Property Group w/ 73% against http://t.co/9BQIysCn
May 21, 2012 10:00
@greenfaucet they are [not] saying the same things about me... spam is truly out of control.
May 21, 2012 9:32
Calendar
| May 2012 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 29 | 30 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 1 | 2 |
Recent Entries
Links
- Boards At Their Best
- Corporate Governance Leaders
- Deal Breaker
- Dealflow
- FEI Financial Reporting Blog
- Idea Transplant
- Inside IPO
- Investor Relations Musings
- IR Café
- IR Web Report
- IR/PR Today
- Q4 Web Systems Blog
- Risk and Governance Blog
- Robert A. G. Monks
- ScudderMedia
- Securities News Watch
- The Shareholder Activist
- TheCorporateCounsel.net Blog
- Transparency Matters
- WCW Insight

Even if you all think I am old school, too I agree with Rob: Annual Reports do offer more than just figures! Its the single one strategy thing every listed company has to do.
And it serves as reference document where people can track things back for many yeears. Online even works easier in this respect as you can just offer a “compare to last year” direct link. See how whe did this at Xstrata’s report http://www.xstrata.com/annualreport/2009/strategy/chiefexecutivesreport.html
on the right hand sind under Tools.
Best
Thomas