street
talk
Home » How We Think » Street Talk » Entries
Talkin’ ABCs with IPOs
4Hi boys and girls! Miss me? Took the family down to the beach for a little Spring Break action so I couldn’t chat with you last week. Sorry I didn’t give you a head’s up but I didn’t want to end up on this devilish Web site.
Anyhow… I’m back in the saddle again and talking a lot of “A-B-Cs” with IPOs. In fact, last Friday, I met with two different management teams that are taking their respective companies public. The companies could not be more different - one a household name, the other a small industrial. Yet, the conversations were frighteningly similar.
Both companies wanted to talk about what they could do now to get ready for life after going public. Both companies wanted to get a better understanding as to how much new responsibilities were going to fall on their existing finance and communications staff. Both companies wanted to know if my colleague and I would actually work on their account or if we were the firm’s sales team (I suppose some firms still have professional sales teams. Frankly, I was surprised me to hear that question twice in the same day - guess my “presentation training” is paying off! LOL). Both companies wanted to know more about the role of their investment bankers after the offering. I think you get the point.
Where the conversations diverged was around the idea of IR as a marketing function AND a compliance function. Not surprisingly, the household name company understood that concept immediately (if not before the meeting even started). The industrial, on the other hand, was a bit skeptical and was much more focused on getting a compliant function in place quickly.
As we’ve discussed here before - both pieces are equally important to the investor relations function. The companies that win for their shareholders over the long term are those who realize that sooner than later.
The Conversation
Stefan Pettersson on April 12, 2010
Rob Berick on April 12, 2010
Ah yes, the old “let the numbers speak for themselves” approach to IR… rarely worked when in vogue and never works now.
LOL re: vacation planning.
Sheryl Joyce on April 12, 2010
Sadly, I think that IBankers are also a part of the problem. Expectations of being public may not be properly conveyed as they typically aren’t involved (nor is there an expectation that they will be) with the IR function. Further, the prospect of the commission to be made oftentimes blur whether a company should go public or not.
That said, helping company’s realize the amount of work that is needed when they become public is the job of everyone involved in the process. IBankers and IR consultants should properly advise on whether the timing is right. The management team should be properly prepared including fine tuning the investor materials along with speaker training. Having a comprehensive website that conveys the company’s investment proposition is also important as is implementing an IR plan (and adhering to it) from the get go.
Rob Berick on April 19, 2010
Sheryl - this is a great point. It still surprises me how many companies view their stock listing as the end of a process instead of the beginning of a process.
Leave a Comment
About rob
Position:Senior Managing Director
Rob oversees Dix & Eaton’s investor relations practice and is a member of the firm’s Leadership Committee. Over his nearly 20-year career, he has developed and executed investor relations programs for companies in a wide range of industries and market cap sizes.
Latest Tweets
@theofrancis No doubt about it re: "resounding defeat" Wont be too far off that we're surprised when one passes I suspect.
May 21, 2012 12:46
Should we be surprised by such votes still? MT @theofrancis: Another #SOP defeat: Simon Property Group w/ 73% against http://t.co/9BQIysCn
May 21, 2012 10:00
@greenfaucet they are [not] saying the same things about me... spam is truly out of control.
May 21, 2012 9:32
Calendar
| May 2012 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 29 | 30 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 1 | 2 |
Recent Entries
Links
- Boards At Their Best
- Corporate Governance Leaders
- Deal Breaker
- Dealflow
- FEI Financial Reporting Blog
- Idea Transplant
- Inside IPO
- Investor Relations Musings
- IR Café
- IR Web Report
- IR/PR Today
- Q4 Web Systems Blog
- Risk and Governance Blog
- Robert A. G. Monks
- ScudderMedia
- Securities News Watch
- The Shareholder Activist
- TheCorporateCounsel.net Blog
- Transparency Matters
- WCW Insight

A few years back, a Nordic industrial was preparing an IPO. Their attitude towards IR was basically that they did not have to focus on it because “they had such great products”... Needless to say, the IPO was not successful. I have also heard of CFOs planning a long vacation once the shares list…